Below are some scenarios involving teachers’ work relating to Standard 3. Decide which rating would be most appropriate based on each scenario, and drag each scenario into the appropriate column. (You’ll only be able to drop it in the correct column.) If you prefer, you can also do this activity using a form with radio buttons. Some browsers may work best with (or show only) one or the other format; use the one that works best for you.
| Scenarios | Ratings | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developing | Proficient | Accomplished | Distinguished | |
| Ms. Flowers does a very good job aligning objectives to the content she teaches. She uses numerous professional resources related to her content when planning and delivering instruction. Ms. Flowers delivers her lessons without content errors. | ||||
| Mr. Sullivan links concepts, content, beliefs and perspectives to global concepts. He attends vertical articulation meetings to discuss requirements needed to meet the demands of vertical alignment. His lesson plans demonstrate linkages between grade levels and course content. | ||||
| Mrs. Phillips integrates core content with 21st century content. She collaborates with core teachers and technical education teachers to show relevance between curricula. She regularly uses outside resources to facilitate students making connections between the classroom and life in the 21st century. | Mr. Williams uses higher order thinking skills, particularly from the Revised Blooms Taxonomy, when planning his lessons. He uses grade level meetings, conversations with administrators, peers and parents to reflect on the rigor and relevance of the curriculum. Often, Mr. Williams will incorporate strategies and resources in lessons that were obtained from professional organizations or professional development. | |||